|
||||||||||||
| calculated ultimate stress vs book tables | |||
| Post Reply | Engineering Forum | ||
| Posted by: berlitz ® 02/08/2010, 09:04:17 Author Profile eMail author Edit |
hi all,
I made an excell program that calculates the stress in an I beam using the fomula sigma=My/I. Where y is the dist to the nutral axis x-x. The program is to calc any beam, but I am trying to find out the optium size of a medium strength concrete beam with a Ultimate strength (in the book) of 4ksi. Everything appears to be calculating properly, but I am confused. As I increase the heigth of the web, the calculated stress lowers. This makes scence as stress is force over area, and there is more area. As I shrink the material in the beam, web, flange, height,etc., the moment of Inertia shrinks and being the devisor, gives a higher stress number. So what does this mean? I am assuming my calculated stress has to be below the ultimate stress in the book (college Mech of materials book). Is this true? I would expect that increasing the web heigth would increase the strength, and that the calculation gives me the stress at the x-x nutral axis. Also that this calculated number should not exceed 4ksi or the concrete beam will fail. Would some of you please confirm this logic, fundemental as it is. I see the trees, but not the forest. Thank You. |
| Post Reply Tell a Friend (must be logged in) Alert Admin About Post |
View All | Previous | Next | |
|
||||
| Replies to this message |
| : calculated ultimate stress vs book tables | |||
| : calculated ultimate stress vs book tables -- berlitz | Post Reply | Top of thread | Engineering Forum |
| Posted by: icfbunt ® 02/08/2010, 20:28:15 Author Profile eMail author Edit |
MY/I gives the stress at a distance Y from the n.a. The highest bending stress will be at the outer edge, and this is the area of concern. The bending stress at the n.a. is typically zero (y=0). As you increase I, sigma goes down as it should. A 2x4 and a 2x6 spanning 10' and carring a pt load at midspan (simply supported beam) both have the same bending moment (M), but the 2x6 has a lower sigma since it has a larger section modulus. Not sure if that's what your asking, but hope it helps. Bunt Modified by icfbunt at Mon, Feb 08, 2010, 20:29:19 |
| Post Reply Tell a Friend (must be logged in) Alert Admin About Post |
Where am I? Original Top of thread | Previous | | |
© Copyright 2000 - 2012, by Engineers Edge, LLC All rights reserved. Disclaimer