Engineers Edge
Feature Variation and Bonus Tolerance
Post Reply   Engineering Forum
Posted by: gwiacek ®

03/14/2010, 15:45:34

Author Profile
eMail author
Edit

We have a chassis that is 4.5" x 8.0" with an .037 +/-.001 EMI Gasket Groove around the top surface of the chassis. We have a situation where a .038 Pin Gage will fit in an isolated area where the End Mill dwelled, entered and exited. I was told that ANSI/AMSE may provide extra tolerance when 90% of a feature like this is good, you get an additional 10% on the tolerance on the remaining 10% of the feature. Is this correct? If so, can you direct to the section in the ASME standard that explains this?
Thanks,
Greg







Post Reply
Tell a Friend (must be logged in)
Alert Admin About Post
View All   Previous | Next |

 
Share |

Replies to this message

: Feature Variation and Bonus Tolerance
: Feature Variation and Bonus Tolerance -- gwiacek Post Reply Top of thread Engineering Forum
Posted by: traingdt ®

03/15/2010, 15:56:44

Author Profile
eMail author
Edit

I'm not familiar with a specific provision for this either. I do know that there is a "rule of thumb" out there that when designing physical gages there is a 10% allowance (5% of that is for wear) based on the product tolerance.

Could this be what you are thinking of? Or maybe I'm way off on a different topic








Post Reply
Tell a Friend (must be logged in)
Alert Admin About Post
Where am I? Original Top of thread Previous |   |
: Feature Variation and Bonus Tolerance
: Feature Variation and Bonus Tolerance -- gwiacek Post Reply Top of thread Engineering Forum
Posted by: Kelly Bramble ®

03/15/2010, 10:42:26

Author Profile
eMail author
Edit

First, your tolerances and description look familiar to me - BAL EMI seal width? Spira EMI seal width? The BAL eccentric EMI seal could have challenges with this as-built groove, however I doubt it. I suspect you could non-conformance this through and ask manufacturing to look at their processes and be careful next time.

As far as the width (or depth) of this groove, I'm not aware of a specific geometric tolerance that will give the tolerance variation on size as you described. You just have to increase the size tolerance to accommodate this - size

ANSI/ASME standard does provide a geometric tolerance (Position) that when applied with a MMC modifier will allow additional LOCATION tolerance when the size changes towards LMC.

There are other methods involving notes and statistical tolerances.

What standard do you folks work to?








Post Reply
Tell a Friend (must be logged in)
Alert Admin About Post
Where am I? Original Top of thread Previous | Next |


© Copyright 2000 - 2012, by Engineers Edge, LLC All rights reserved.  Disclaimer