Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Continuous Feature Question - 1

  1. #1

    Continuous Feature Question - 1

    Per the attached image, which call outs are equivalent, if any?

    Thank you!
    Attached Files Attached Files

  2. #2
    Technical Fellow Kelly_Bramble's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Bold Springs, GA
    Posts
    2,611
    None of the options are equivalent.
    Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.

  3. #3
    OK, sorry if I broke a forum rule.

    But there is a nameless source that states that CF is the same as a composite position tolerance with the lower segment calling out a geometric tolerance of zero at MMC with respect to no datums.

    I now have two credible sources stating different opinions on a standard, which should only have one interpretation.....

    I guess I will shy away from using CF until I can find more evidence for its correct use.
    Last edited by Andrew T; 07-14-2016 at 09:53 AM.

  4. #4
    Technical Fellow Kelly_Bramble's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Bold Springs, GA
    Posts
    2,611
    But there is a nameless source that states that CF is the same as a composite position tolerance with the lower segment calling out a geometric tolerance of zero at MMC with respect to no datums.

    Actually - they don't. The presentation video is about how to control two separate hole features as though they are one.. They do not say that the specifications are equivalent or identical.

    You should take these questions up with the training materials preparer... At this time you are utilizing Engineers Edge to support somebody else training material.
    Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •