There is not a virtual condition for a FOS at RFS. The size of the feature can be checked wit a go and no-go gauge sized at MMC and LMC. Location tolerance must be measured from a RF simulator (actual size).
Hello all-
I am aware of how to perform virtual condition checks for MMC and LMC but I am wondering how does one verify (what is the math?) that the RFS true position applied to a hole will work in a mating condition.
Example:
C'sink with .150" thru hole @ (dia) True position .010" RFS.
mates to
#6 thread (.138) @ (dia) True position .028" RFS
How would you verify through math that your true position tolerancing is OK at RFS?
Thanks
There is not a virtual condition for a FOS at RFS. The size of the feature can be checked wit a go and no-go gauge sized at MMC and LMC. Location tolerance must be measured from a RF simulator (actual size).
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
ASME Y14.5-2009 fig 2-14 and 2-17
Figure 2.14 - and 2.17 - the FOS is specified at RFS within the Feature Control Frame, there is an Outer Boundary and Inner Boundary - NOT a Virtual or Resultant condition.
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.