### Hazen-Williams Equation for Pipe Friction and Pressure Drop

Related:

** Hazen-Williams Water Pressure Drop Flow Rates Equations and Calculator
**

**Fluid Flow Table of Contents**

Hydraulic and Pneumatic Knowledge

Pipe Friction Calculations Within Pipe For Fluid Flow

Hydraulic and Pneumatic Knowledge

Pipe Friction Calculations Within Pipe For Fluid Flow

Hazen-Williams formula:

V = k C R^{0.63} S^{0.54}

Where:

Full flow circular pipes Hazen-Williams

R = D / 4

By Continuity

Q = V A

V = fluid velocity, m/s (ft/s),

C = factor for relative roughness Hazen-Williams coefficient

R = hydraulic pipe radius, m^{} (ft),

S = Slope of the energy linie (head loss divided by pipe length),

k = conversion factor for unit system

k = 0.849 for units of m/sec

k = 1.318 for units of ft/sec

Flow round pipe

Imperial Units

Q = 0.432 C D ^{2.63} S^{0.54}

Where

Q = ft^{3} / sec

S = ft

SI Units

Q = 0.278 C D ^{2.63} S^{0.54}

Where

Q = m^{3} / sec

S = m

SI Units Head loss formula

h_{f} = S L

or

h_{f} = L ( Q / ( 0.278 C D ^{2.63} ) ^{( 1 / 0.54)}

Where:

h_{f} = head loss height

The Hazen-Williams formula is empirically derived and is limited to use with fluids that have a kinematic viscosity of approximately 1.12 x 10^{-6} m^{2} /s (1.22 x 10^{-5} ft^{2} /s), which corresponds to water at 15.6 C (60 F), and for turbulent flow. Deviations from these conditions can lead to significant error. The Hazen-Williams coefficient, C, is independent of the Reynolds number. The **Pipe Roughness Coefficient Chart** provides values of C for various pipe materials.

The Chezy-Manning equation is occasionally applied to full pipe flow. The use of this equation requires turbulent flow and an accurate estimate of the Manning factor, n, which varies by material and increases with increasing pipe size. **Pipe Roughness Coefficient Chart** provides values of n for various pipe materials. The Chezy-Manning equation is:

where:

h_{L} = head loss, m (ft)

V = fluid velocity, m/s (ft/s)

n = Manning factor

a = empirical constant, 1.0 for SI units (2.22 for IP units)

Reference:

Robert Pitt, University of Alabama

Shirley Clark, Penn State Harrisburg